The Rights of the Accused in a Sexual Harassment Investigation
By Neil Klingshirn
- Balancing the rights of the accused in a Sexual Harassment Investigation
- What happens if the accusation is false?
- Does this mean that the Accused do not have Any Rights?
- What can Employers do to Treat Employees Accused of Harassment Fairly?
- What should I do if I cannot tell who is telling the Truth?
- prohibit sexual harassment
- encourage employees to complain about sexual harassment;
- provide for prompt investigations into sexual harassment complaints; and
- require appropriate corrective action for violations of the sexual harassment policy.
Employers can credit the story told by the accused and can even discipline the complainant for a false complaint. However, the employer runs the risk that, if the accusation was true, the victim of the harassment can take the employer to court. On the other hand, if the employer credits the story of the accuser, the employer runs little risk that the accused will be able to sue it. Thus, employers often take no chances. They opt for firing the accused, who has limited rights under federal and state laws to challenge their termination.
Not exactly. If the accused is an employee at-will, his or her employer is free to terminate him or her for no reason or even a bad reason, so long as it is not a reason prohibited by law. Discharging an employee based on an accusation of sexual harassment is not unlawful, even if the accusation is not correct. Thus, the safe path for the employer is to credit the accuser and not the accused.
However, if the real reason for discharging the accused is unlawful, covering up the real reason with a false accusation of harassment can lead to employer liability.
Second, conduct a thorough investigation. An employer should question the complainant, the accused and those persons who have direct, tangible knowledge of the accusations or defense.
Third, an employer should act on a good-faith belief that the allegations are true before taking adverse employment action. If the employer does not believe that the accusation is true, a jury probably will not believe it either. Since a jury can base a finding of discrimination or retaliation on proof that an employer's stated reason for termination is false, a false accusation can lead to discrimination or retaliation liability.
Fourth, do not publish false information or disclose a false accusation to people who do not "need to know" the results of the investigation.
Fifth, do not conduct a criminal background check using an outside agency without an employee's prior consent to the background check.
- A primer on construction bonds
- Arbitration agreements faq
- Construction contract basics
- Construction contract clauses
- Discrimination and EEOC FAQs
- FMLA FAQs
- Liens; defense options
- Liens; lawsuit to foreclose
- Liens; limiting lien rights
- Liens; preserve and perfect
- Loan Officer Overtime
- Non-competition agreement FAQs
- Retaliation FAQs
- Rights of the Accused
- Severance Agreement FAQs
- Union salting campaigns
- Union salting objectives
- Union salting: Employee Q&As