Indemnification Clauses in Construction Contracts

posted by Michael Fortney  |  Dec 15, 2009 10:09 PM in Construction Law

Clauses in construction contracts where the promisor indemnifies "against liability for damages arising out of bodily injury to persons or damage to property . . caused by the negligence of the promisee" are against public policy and void.  Ohio Revised Code §2305.31.  

Accordingly, an agreement between an owner and a contractor, whereby the contractor agreed to indemnify the owner for any claims related to the contractor's work, was void and did not require a contractor to indemnify an owner against a claim by the contractor's employee against the owner for injuries suffered on the job allegedly caused by the owner's negligence.  Kendall v. U.S. Dismantling Co., 20 Ohio St. 2d 61 (1985).

The Cuyahoga County Court of Appeals has interpreted the statute to prohibit requirements in a construction contract that the contractor name another an additional insured on his CGL policy to insure against the owner's negligence.  Buckeye Union Ins. Co. v. Zavarella Bros. Constr. Co., 1997 Ohio App. LEXIS 2934 (July 3, 1997).

The statute also invalidates any requirement for the contractor to pay the owner's attorneys fees and costs in a lawsuit arising from the contractor's work for the owner, if such a requirement is contained within a void indemnification clause.  Moore v. Dayton Power & Light Co., 99 Ohio App. 3d 138 (1994).